Will You Press The Button?

asheropmanop7 months ago

is good and bad bad and good I will choose no because Nuclear weapon let the world peace for a long times and Nuclear Station could make Nuclear explodsion so it would is bad to choose no

asheropmanop7 months ago

I mean is bad to choose yes

Vert9999 years ago

The upside is a downside and the downside is an upside

Loophole man9 years ago

You are correct. Sometimes, nuclear weapons are necessary, and nuclear power will put a stop to the world ending from pollution

ScalyWeasel8 years ago

49% don't know how safe and reliable nuclear power actually is.

coolbat9048 years ago

This actually creates more danger, because anyone could drop a regular bomb on the nuclear power plant and createn a nuclear explosion

Bgoerz056 years ago

Actually, nuclear plants are built so that doesn't happen.

urimegaconnor8 years ago

no downside.

P78 years ago

Y U NO GIBE A DAM DOWNSIDE. Yea "dam", like percy jackson dam

bezvous9 years ago

Only thing that can go wrong in nuclear power plants is human factor. Like in Chernobil and if that happens it will start chain reaction and whole world will blow.

Alex Merezas12 years ago

how is there even a downside to this, nuclear power plants are much safer than coal-powered ones.

Hyltran4 years ago

To say that it could “blow up” is like saying we should not have airplanes ✈️ because of the Hindenburg disaster.

Load more replies

DragonEXE7 years ago

WE’RE FUCKED

RowanDavis7 years ago

I already live near one.

TheMultimention8 years ago

No! I want my explosions!!!! 😭

BobbyMcslobby8 years ago

My dog fartes

Jay-the-Argonian8 years ago

Basically the world of fallout without bombs?

IsHARI9 years ago

no downside

Acespeed9 years ago

there is other ways to make power

That_One_Weird_Wolf4 years ago

anybody hear about the "walking ghost phase"? its where all the chromosomes in your body die, and you cant make any more. so your body slowly becomes a corpse. if a nuclear power plant were to blow up, this could happen. so, my conclusion is, HELL NO.

Malcolmxt7 years ago

Insta yes nuclear reactors evidence wise is the least dangourus of the coal and other types of reactors. Also nuclear reactors dont explode so they wont set each other off. Also canada would be rich after this since we have the largest uranium mine in the ...[Show full comment]

Natanm18 years ago

World peace a good power source why the fucking hell nit

meatloave9 months ago

All the power plants use Thorium reactors instead of Uranium. Far FAAAAR cleaner and safer

Hyltran4 years ago

If we want to stop 🛑 global warning we haw no other reasonable option then to haw a small nuclear ☢️ power plant close to every significant city.

Hamistagan8 years ago

just hope to god terrorist dont target the small town i live in

SemiIsback7 years ago

Yesss no NK then,.....

ssuper slade9 years ago

if you pushed the button gg world

9u4ck3rs4 years ago

The only reason that no country has fired it"s nuclear weapons is because everyone else would fire their weapons and basically end/ destroy the world

C7_Aerospace7 years ago

fission or fusion?

OscarZhang7 years ago

Hope it is fusion, much safer. Although over all nuclear power plants are still one of the safest forms of power in the world

Load more replies

Benjamin Istaqa12 years ago

I PRESS ALL THE RED BUTTONS!!!

push?9 years ago

WHY!!! put in your ipinion

lewis04283 years ago

Simply use higher technology to stop meltdowns. No more air pollution. WIN-WIN.

Migdin18 years ago

If a nuclear power plant explodes, it would make an Nuculear explision, and that is in a way a Nuculear weapon, so they cant harm you

Lzke7 years ago

Only that a nuclear bomb ironically doesn't have as much harmful radiation and fallout as a nuclear reactor exploding. So yea...

Lzke7 years ago

How exaclty do you disarm weapons? I mean it"s not like a nuke is carryong a fucking shotgun on its back (whereever that may be)

Transgender9 years ago

That would kill every city on earth. Just imagine terrorist blowing them up or creating NEW nuclear weapons

Liothlast year

So long as a third party runs each of the plants, this is fine.

MaikHD20044 years ago

Nuclear power in what form? Fusion or split?

Flab bag morris9 years ago

Freaky209 years ago

So... Fallout?

#Rekt9 years ago

FALLOUT YES >:D GET YOUR STIMPAKS AT THE READY

Load more replies

Asdasdas5 months ago

nukes kept humanity from a cold war going hot, itll happen again

KoseiPL3 years ago

Mfs not clicking: i dOnt WaNT SEcOnd cHErNoBYL

UnitZulu-6 years ago

I feel at that point trying to upkeep the plants to not leak radiation would start being very expsensive and dangerous

BristolBrick9 years ago

That would make the fucking sun disappear.

Lzke7 years ago

How on earth did you reach that conclusion?

Load more replies

Umbrella4 years ago

most nuclear power plants now use thorium a much safer element and it even works better than uranium there are lots of videos on the internet about this topic and I ain't no expert but I know that nuclear power is much safer than driving a car.

ofpgrimm1028 years ago

this is the world all ready so yeah

Lzke7 years ago

Austria is a lot bigger than 5 miles yet we only have one nuclear reactor that never started operating. What"s your point exactly?

BebeRocks7 years ago

I"ve seen how this one went in fallout

bungus22 months ago

nuclear power is not as dangerous as people think, they are designed to be as safe as possible when melting down. wayyyy better than coal power and fuel lasts much longer too

Steeler248 years ago

We need nuclear weapons

Lzke7 years ago

For what? To blast ourselves into oblivion?

T._Lost_is_a_good_boi2 years ago

Let’s ignore all laws of nuclear physics for a moment and assume that bombing a reactor is equivalent to said reactor going into a Chernobyl-esque meltdown. Bombing any city’s power plant(s) makes that (section of said) city practically unlivable for decad...[Show full comment]