Will You Press The Button?

Aldebaran_Smith 8 months ago

Downside?

Maharid 9 months ago

I'll pass for "within five miles of every city", there ar currently near 12K MAJOR cities, but a "city", depending on the country, need to have from 5K to 50K individuals living in it, with the lower limit there will be probably at least 50K nuclear reacto... [Show full comment]

asyraf_414 8 months ago

not if its actually the size of atom

asheropmanop 2 years ago

is good and bad bad and good I will choose no because Nuclear weapon let the world peace for a long times and Nuclear Station could make Nuclear explodsion so it would is bad to choose no

asheropmanop 2 years ago

I mean is bad to choose yes

Vert999 10 years ago

The upside is a downside and the downside is an upside

Loophole man 10 years ago

You are correct. Sometimes, nuclear weapons are necessary, and nuclear power will put a stop to the world ending from pollution

ScalyWeasel 10 years ago

49% don't know how safe and reliable nuclear power actually is.

urimegaconnor 10 years ago

no downside.

coolbat904 9 years ago

This actually creates more danger, because anyone could drop a regular bomb on the nuclear power plant and createn a nuclear explosion

Bgoerz05 8 years ago

Actually, nuclear plants are built so that doesn't happen.

P7 10 years ago

Y U NO GIBE A DAM DOWNSIDE. Yea "dam", like percy jackson dam

bezvous 10 years ago

Only thing that can go wrong in nuclear power plants is human factor. Like in Chernobil and if that happens it will start chain reaction and whole world will blow.

Alex Merezas 13 years ago

how is there even a downside to this, nuclear power plants are much safer than coal-powered ones.

Hyltran 5 years ago

To say that it could “blow up” is like saying we should not have airplanes ✈️ because of the Hindenburg disaster.

Load more replies

DragonEXE 9 years ago

WE’RE FUCKED

RowanDavis 9 years ago

I already live near one.

TheMultimention 9 years ago

No! I want my explosions!!!! 😭

BobbyMcslobby 10 years ago

My dog fartes

Jay-the-Argonian 10 years ago

Basically the world of fallout without bombs?

IsHARI 10 years ago

no downside

ssuper slade 10 years ago

if you pushed the button gg world

9u4ck3rs 6 years ago

The only reason that no country has fired it"s nuclear weapons is because everyone else would fire their weapons and basically end/ destroy the world

C7_Aerospace 9 years ago

fission or fusion?

OscarZhang 8 years ago

Hope it is fusion, much safer. Although over all nuclear power plants are still one of the safest forms of power in the world

Load more replies

Benjamin Istaqa 13 years ago

I PRESS ALL THE RED BUTTONS!!!

push? 10 years ago

WHY!!! put in your ipinion

lewis0428 4 years ago

Simply use higher technology to stop meltdowns. No more air pollution. WIN-WIN.

Migdin1 10 years ago

If a nuclear power plant explodes, it would make an Nuculear explision, and that is in a way a Nuculear weapon, so they cant harm you

Lzke 8 years ago

Only that a nuclear bomb ironically doesn't have as much harmful radiation and fallout as a nuclear reactor exploding. So yea...

Lzke 8 years ago

How exaclty do you disarm weapons? I mean it"s not like a nuke is carryong a fucking shotgun on its back (whereever that may be)

Transgender 10 years ago

That would kill every city on earth. Just imagine terrorist blowing them up or creating NEW nuclear weapons

Lioth 3 years ago

So long as a third party runs each of the plants, this is fine.

Flab bag morris 10 years ago

MaikHD2004 6 years ago

Nuclear power in what form? Fusion or split?

Freaky20 10 years ago

So... Fallout?

#Rekt 10 years ago

FALLOUT YES >:D GET YOUR STIMPAKS AT THE READY

Load more replies

Asdasdas 2 years ago

nukes kept humanity from a cold war going hot, itll happen again

KoseiPL 4 years ago

Mfs not clicking: i dOnt WaNT SEcOnd cHErNoBYL

UnitZulu- 7 years ago

I feel at that point trying to upkeep the plants to not leak radiation would start being very expsensive and dangerous

BristolBrick 10 years ago

That would make the fucking sun disappear.

Lzke 8 years ago

How on earth did you reach that conclusion?

Load more replies

Umbrella 6 years ago

most nuclear power plants now use thorium a much safer element and it even works better than uranium there are lots of videos on the internet about this topic and I ain't no expert but I know that nuclear power is much safer than driving a car.

ofpgrimm102 10 years ago

this is the world all ready so yeah

Lzke 8 years ago

Austria is a lot bigger than 5 miles yet we only have one nuclear reactor that never started operating. What"s your point exactly?

BebeRocks 9 years ago

I"ve seen how this one went in fallout

bungus2 2 years ago

nuclear power is not as dangerous as people think, they are designed to be as safe as possible when melting down. wayyyy better than coal power and fuel lasts much longer too

Steeler24 9 years ago

We need nuclear weapons

Lzke 8 years ago

For what? To blast ourselves into oblivion?

T._Lost_is_a_good_boi 3 years ago

Let’s ignore all laws of nuclear physics for a moment and assume that bombing a reactor is equivalent to said reactor going into a Chernobyl-esque meltdown. Bombing any city’s power plant(s) makes that (section of said) city practically unlivable for decad... [Show full comment]

SceptileandMew 6 years ago

@theaceace you might not have read it but all nuclear disasters are caused but nuclear weapons F A C T S

meatloave 6 months ago

thats actually a pretty good trade especially since NP is the only source of energy far fffaaaaaarrrrr more money will be spent further developing its efficiency , safety , output ect.

IchibanKasuga 3 years ago

Bryce I will defeat you!

imavirginnn 5 years ago

nuke

midnightiscool95 10 years ago

Downside?

BugTypeEevee 8 years ago

It said nuclear weapons were disarmed not nuclear power.

BrightWarrior last year

I wish we could get rid of nukes but I think nuclear power everywhere would be bad for the environment so I'm not pressing it.

EVILDE5TROYER 10 years ago

But wind and solar power are much better for the atmosphere and are less likely to explode

OscarZhang 8 years ago

They are unpredictable and nobody can control the weather so nuclear is better for the power grid

adihan 3 years ago

I laughed at him for two and a half years! If you want to participate in nuclear war, press it as much as you like!!

Acespeed 10 years ago

there is other ways to make power

That_One_Weird_Wolf 6 years ago

anybody hear about the "walking ghost phase"? its where all the chromosomes in your body die, and you cant make any more. so your body slowly becomes a corpse. if a nuclear power plant were to blow up, this could happen. so, my conclusion is, HELL NO.

Malcolmxt 9 years ago

Insta yes nuclear reactors evidence wise is the least dangourus of the coal and other types of reactors. Also nuclear reactors dont explode so they wont set each other off. Also canada would be rich after this since we have the largest uranium mine in the ... [Show full comment]

Notifications

95 Comments

Login or register to comment