is good and bad bad and good
I will choose no because Nuclear weapon let the world peace for a long times and Nuclear Station could make Nuclear explodsion so it would is bad to choose no
asheropmanop7 months ago
I mean is bad to choose yes
Loading replies...
Loading replies...
Vert9999 years ago
The upside is a downside and the downside is an upside
Loophole man9 years ago
You are correct. Sometimes, nuclear weapons are necessary, and nuclear power will put a stop to the world ending from pollution
Loading replies...
Loading replies...
ScalyWeasel8 years ago
49% don't know how safe and reliable nuclear power actually is.
Loading replies...
coolbat9048 years ago
This actually creates more danger, because anyone could drop a regular bomb on the nuclear power plant and createn a nuclear explosion
Bgoerz056 years ago
Actually, nuclear plants are built so that doesn't happen.
Loading replies...
Loading replies...
urimegaconnor8 years ago
no downside.
Loading replies...
P78 years ago
Y U NO GIBE A DAM DOWNSIDE. Yea "dam", like percy jackson dam
Loading replies...
bezvous9 years ago
Only thing that can go wrong in nuclear power plants is human factor. Like in Chernobil and if that happens it will start chain reaction and whole world will blow.
Loading replies...
Alex Merezas12 years ago
how is there even a downside to this, nuclear power plants are much safer than coal-powered ones.
Hyltran4 years ago
To say that it could “blow up” is like saying we should not have airplanes ✈️ because of the Hindenburg disaster.
most nuclear power plants now use thorium a much safer element and it even works better than uranium there are lots of videos on the internet about this topic and I ain't no expert but I know that nuclear power is much safer than driving a car.
Loading replies...
ofpgrimm1028 years ago
this is the world all ready so yeah
Lzke7 years ago
Austria is a lot bigger than 5 miles yet we only have one nuclear reactor that never started operating. What"s your point exactly?
Loading replies...
Loading replies...
BebeRocks7 years ago
I"ve seen how this one went in fallout
Loading replies...
bungus22 months ago
nuclear power is not as dangerous as people think, they are designed to be as safe as possible when melting down. wayyyy better than coal power and fuel lasts much longer too
Loading replies...
Steeler248 years ago
We need nuclear weapons
Lzke7 years ago
For what? To blast ourselves into oblivion?
Loading replies...
Loading replies...
T._Lost_is_a_good_boi2 years ago
Let’s ignore all laws of nuclear physics for a moment and assume that bombing a reactor is equivalent to said reactor going into a Chernobyl-esque meltdown. Bombing any city’s power plant(s) makes that (section of said) city practically unlivable for decad...[Show full comment]
Loading replies...
SceptileandMew5 years ago
@theaceace you might not have read it but all nuclear disasters are caused but nuclear weapons F A C T S
Loading replies...
IchibanKasugalast year
Bryce I will defeat you!
Loading replies...
imavirginnn4 years ago
nuke
Loading replies...
midnightiscool959 years ago
Downside?
Loading replies...
BugTypeEevee7 years ago
It said nuclear weapons were disarmed not nuclear power.
Loading replies...
adihanlast year
I laughed at him for two and a half years! If you want to participate in nuclear war, press it as much as you like!!
Loading replies...
EVILDE5TROYER8 years ago
But wind and solar power are much better for the atmosphere and are less likely to explode
OscarZhang7 years ago
They are unpredictable and nobody can control the weather so nuclear is better for the power grid
Loading replies...
Loading replies...
Acespeed9 years ago
there is other ways to make power
Loading replies...
That_One_Weird_Wolf4 years ago
anybody hear about the "walking ghost phase"? its where all the chromosomes in your body die, and you cant make any more. so your body slowly becomes a corpse. if a nuclear power plant were to blow up, this could happen. so, my conclusion is, HELL NO.
Loading replies...
Malcolmxt7 years ago
Insta yes nuclear reactors evidence wise is the least dangourus of the coal and other types of reactors. Also nuclear reactors dont explode so they wont set each other off.
Also canada would be rich after this since we have the largest uranium mine in the ...[Show full comment]
Loading replies...
Natanm18 years ago
World peace a good power source why the fucking hell nit
Loading replies...
meatloave9 months ago
All the power plants use Thorium reactors instead of Uranium. Far FAAAAR cleaner and safer
Loading replies...
Hyltran4 years ago
If we want to stop 🛑 global warning we haw no other reasonable option then to haw a small nuclear ☢️ power plant close to every significant city.
Loading replies...
Hamistagan8 years ago
just hope to god terrorist dont target the small town i live in
Loading replies...
SemiIsback7 years ago
Yesss no NK then,.....
Loading replies...
ssuper slade9 years ago
if you pushed the button gg world
Loading replies...
9u4ck3rs4 years ago
The only reason that no country has fired it"s nuclear weapons is because everyone else would fire their weapons and basically end/ destroy the world
Loading replies...
C7_Aerospace7 years ago
fission or fusion?
OscarZhang7 years ago
Hope it is fusion, much safer. Although over all nuclear power plants are still one of the safest forms of power in the world
89 Comments
Login or register to comment
© WillYouPressTheButton.com • since 2013
Stats • Contact Us • EULA • Privacy policy